Fix fail label logic with bs_create_bin #1731
Conversation
pguyot
force-pushed
the
w26/fix-bs-create-bin
branch
2 times, most recently
from
caf7f0c to
87de5d8
Compare
The error seems to be: sh: ./src/AtomV: not found |
|
I don’t know if this most recent FreeBSD failure is related to using ninja, but here logs reports “Packing archive test_estdlib_lib.avm” but line 125 of build-and-test-on-FreeBSD.yml tries to execute |
|
It looks like one of the yaml file is getting truncated: In case we find a fix of this, let's do that on a separated commit |
|
I think run script is getting truncated somehow at around 1003 characters. Anyway I opened an issue here: |
|
I meant to remove part of this PR changes to see if this truncation still happens. Will try to do that tonight or this weekend. |
pguyot
force-pushed
the
w26/fix-bs-create-bin
branch
2 times, most recently
from
9a58aed to
b12b17f
Compare
pguyot
force-pushed
the
w26/fix-bs-create-bin
branch
from
b12b17f to
be344c1
Compare
pguyot
force-pushed
the
w26/fix-bs-create-bin
branch
from
be344c1 to
109c191
Compare
Also simplify bs_create_bin Add tests for bs_create_bin using Erlang assembly Signed-off-by: Paul Guyot <[email protected]>
pguyot
force-pushed
the
w26/fix-bs-create-bin
branch
from
109c191 to
d4f63dd
Compare
Fix fail cases in OP_BS_START_MATCH3 & OP_BS_START_MATCH4 Continuation of #1731 These changes are made under both the "Apache 2.0" and the "GNU Lesser General Public License 2.1 or later" license terms (dual license). SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR LGPL-2.1-or-later
Rebased on top of #1745 as a workaround for vmactions/freebsd-vm#105
Also simplify bs_create_bin
Add tests for bs_create_bin using Erlang assembly
These changes are made under both the "Apache 2.0" and the "GNU Lesser General
Public License 2.1 or later" license terms (dual license).
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR LGPL-2.1-or-later